Search
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Publications
  • Bio
  • Contact
  • Sign in
Close
Menu
Search
Close
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Publications
  • Bio
  • Contact
  • Sign in
Menu

Ksenia Anske

December 6, 2015

Why editing is so damn hard

by Ksenia Anske


Art by Winnie Truong

Art by Winnie Truong

Art by Winnie Truong

Art by Winnie Truong

This post is dedicated to all editors out there, the magnificent people who have the talent to shape the fragile mess of words they receive from writers into something beautiful and yet still FUCKING FRAGILE AND MESSY the way it originally was. And when you look at it, at what they do, you scratch your head and wonder how the hell they do it. Or maybe you don't. Maybe you take it for granted. I know I did. Until last week. I thought, "Hey, that's what they're good at. That's what editors do. It's their job." I didn't know how hard it was until I tried it on my own.

This week I have received from Sarah the final condensed manuscript for Siren Suicides. What she did was squeeze 3 books (262K words) into 1 book (88K words) by doing magic cutting and stitching and reorganizing and yet keeping the story intact. I was elated. I dug into reading it as soon as I could. And guess what happened. I got so disgusted with my old writing that at first I rewrote a sentence. Then a paragraph. Then a whole page. Then I ended up spending a whole day on rewriting 6 first pages by mercilessly lopping off chunks of descriptions and dialogue and exposition and just plain butchering the thing till what I had left was clean gleaming bones. I polished the bones somewhat. When they were shining I was satisfied at last. I intended to do the same for the rest of the thing which at the rate of 6 pages a day would've taken me 55 days to finish which would've put my writing schedule on hold and instead of starting TUBE, Draft 3 in January I would've started it in March. I got gloomy thoughts on shooting myself with a Kalashnikov because, frankly, I didn't want to do this. I'm good at making myself do things I don't like, BUT I AM SO DONE WITH THIS STORY I DON'T WANT TO TOUCH IT.

Read More

TAGS: Siren Suicides, editing, rewriting, voice


September 29, 2015

The consistency of your voice

by Ksenia Anske


Photo by Tom Kondrat

Photo by Tom Kondrat

Photo by Tom Kondrat

Photo by Tom Kondrat

You know that feeling you get when you read a fantastic book and it gives you shivers? When every page you turn makes you want to read more and more, and every sentence is so bloody good you want to read it twice and when you get to the end you're devastated the book is over? I have been pondering about this lately, having recently read three books that took my breath away, THE OLD MAN AND THE SEA by Ernest Hemingway and THE RITUAL by Adam Nevill and CRUDDY by Lynda Barry, and having dug up more information on all authors and having read this interview with Adam Nevill and having put WHAT IT IS by Lynda Barry (a book on her creative method) and Hemingway's ON WRITING on hold at the library, and all this pondering led me to write this post.

What was it so special about these books that got me? 

Read More

TAGS: voice, consistency, writing, rewriting, drafts


November 12, 2014

Write more with fewer words

by Ksenia Anske


Photo by Patty Maher

Photo by Patty Maher

Photo by Patty Maher

Photo by Patty Maher

I'm thrilled to read Isaac Asimov for the first time (yes, I know, you're allowed to spank me), and this nagging thought that's been badgering me lately surfaced again. The economy of words. The ability to say a lot with next to nothing. The poetry of imagining that which the writer omitted, omitted for the reader to fill in. Wouldn't we all like to do that? Don't we all get chills when we read something so profound, so crisp, something said so succinctly with just a few words? I know I want to learn how to do this (especially because I tend to blab a lot), and I know you want to learn this too. Here then. Let me muse on the subject, share with you what I've learned.

The economy in words comes from a lot of rewriting.

Read More

TAGS: less is more, economical writing, writing style, rewriting, Isaac Asimov


December 1, 2013

On novel structure

by Ksenia Anske


Photo by Brooke Shaden

Photo by Brooke Shaden

Photo by Brooke Shaden

Photo by Brooke Shaden

First, let me apologize for this blog post being late. I have successfully moved to the Moon, but have lost a bit of time to a black hole, it seems. Am I forgiven? Yes? Excellent. Let us proceed with the curious topic of novel structure. I got this question from a reader in the email:

"I'm writing my first novel, and it's based on a true story that I experienced, but of course it is fiction so I can tell it better. I'm struggling with the structure. At first I thought I could form it as letters/emails to one of the other characters, written by the protagonist. Yet, that only lasted a page before it turned into "journal entries" by the main character. It still feels off as I write. Do you have any suggestions?"

I haven't written over 30 novels to be able to claim that I'm a novel structure expert, alas, am only writing my 4th, ROSEHEAD. However, I do have some ideas about it. For what they're worth, here is what I go by.  

Every story should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. This is so simple, yet in the frenzy of daily writing so easy to forget. Some people call this a three act structure, others call it something else. The point is to create a world for the reader to be able to plunge in, sail through, and get out with a sense of something major being accomplished. Think of it this way. Remember the story that you heard recently that grabbed you. It can be anything, even a news article, like, this morning a mutant raccoon ate Mrs. Shlaugbauer in her own backyard. Wow. You want to know more, right You're like, what the fuck, mutant raccoon? I hooked you. In a sense, that's the first act, or the beginning. Something happens. In this sense, it doesn't matter how you write it, be it in the form of the main characters's diary or journal entry, like in THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER by Stephen Chbosky. What matters is, what happened? Why would the reader want to keep reading? This initial event is the beginning of any story, be it a teenage conversation ("OMG, did you hear about Johnny getting wasted yesterday?") or a fantasy series beginning ("The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed."). Both examples introduce a character we're curious about, either because we know him (Johnny), or because we want to know him (the gunslinger). The entire beginning is the expanded setup on this idea, to let us know where we are, what happened, who are the main players in the story, and so on. Once we get comfortable, BAM! Something drastic happens, and the meat of the story begins, where we know who is doing what and what they want out of it. The end is essentially the characters getting something they wanted, or not. Hence comes the payoff for us. It's why we read books. In life we rarely get a chance for things to resolve to any satisfaction, things are in the air, even the end of our lives is in the air, because we still don't know for sure what happens after we die. That's why the ending has to be clear, for us to have that awesome resolution feeling.

Clear story structure comes not from writing, but from rewriting. All first drafts are piles of mumbo-jumbo higgledy-piggledy stream of consciousness that can be simply called SHIT. The goal is not to obsess over structure, the goal is to dump it all out on the page, to start seeing any structure at all. So it's okay if you feel your writing has no structure. Keep writing until you've got it all out, until you feel like your story has come to an end and there is nothing else you can add. You might start out with the idea of wanting to write a novel, and it might end up a short story or a novella. It's okay. It's better to write a good novella than a poor novel. Size doesn't matter, story does. After you write it and have a chance to sit down and read the whole thing from beginning to end, you will start seeing patterns. Stephen King said something along the lines of, you're unearthing a skeleton buried in the ground, you start seeing bones, and a skull, and you keep cleaning the debris away until the whole thing is out. I would suggest a radical approach, something I did with SIREN SUICIDES, not because I knew how to do structure, but precisely because I didn't know how to do structure. I simply wrote and rewrote and rewrote until I started seeing order emerge. In the end, I think I might have overwritten it (did 5 drafts), but I learned a lot, and with ROSEHEAD I'm only doing 3 drafts. It's a feeling you get, and the more you write, the clearer it becomes. So don't worry about novel structure, just write. It will come.

Read a lot, to find books that will teach you structure. I don't mean reading books about writing. Forget those. Uh-oh. Did I just dare say this? Oh no, I know what's coming. Dear esteemed fellow writers who have written books on how to write books, please don't take this as an insult. It's not. It's simply my way of dealing with my own insecurities as a writer. I'll explain. The only book on the craft of writing I like is Stephen King's ON WRITING. Why? Because it didn't down talk to me. Stevie simply shared his life and his findings on how to write books. Most books about writing I read make me feel like an idiot. I get depressed, thinking, great, there is so much about writing I don't know, why the fuck would I even try writing? Forget it. It makes me depressed. So I blatantly ignore them. I AM SURE THERE ARE A TON OF AWESOME ONES OUT THERE. It's just that, every time I get depressed, I lose writing time (it usually kicks me out of my normal creative state for about a week). What does help me, and I think will help you, is reading a lot of novels. And I mean, A LOT. I try to read a novel a week. The thing is, the more you read, the more structure you will see in novels. You will pick it up on some gut level, that feeling that you know what the writer is doing. The problem is, we're all different, our senses are attuned differently, so it might take you a while to find your types of books, your types of authors, whose books talk to you. Just keep reading.

After all of this being said, my only two rules are, to write for at least 4 hours a day and to read for at least 2 hours a day. I don't think about structure or character development or any of those other fancy terms, I concentrate on getting the story out, hoping that one day I'll learn all there is to learn, and stubbornly moving forward no matter what.

TAGS: structure, novel writing, novel structure, rewriting, reading, writing, how to